In Merrill Lynch v. Manning, the US Supreme Court has held that federal securities laws don’t preempt some claims from being brought in state court, upholding a Third Circuit ruling that sent a suit against a Merrill Lynch unit and other Wall Street firms back to a New Jersey state court.
Litigation partner Peter Haveles provided Law360 with his opinion on the importance of the decision:
"The Supreme Court has narrowed the ability to remove state law claims based on conduct in the securities markets and bars federal jurisdiction unless the state law action is brought to give effect the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. In other words, the court seems to require a determination that the act was 'infringed' or 'breached' in order for there to be exclusive federal jurisdiction. The decision may well encourage plaintiffs to assert more state law claims in state court in order to avoid the stricter standards that the act and the Supreme Court decisions under the act have imposed on claims for fraud or market manipulation."
Also of Interest
- And Now A Word From The Panel: MDL Venue Choices November 30, 2016 • Articles
- Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association Honors Waks November 17, 2016 • Recognitions
- Second Circuit Expands Split on Nominative Fair Use November 16, 2016 • Articles
- JUVE Handbuch Recommends Frankfurt Office and Lawyers November 14, 2016 • Recognitions
- Chambers UK 2017 Recognizes London Partners and Aviation Finance Practice November 7, 2016 • Recognitions
- Lattanzio Receives NYSBA Pro Bono Award November 3, 2016 • Recognitions
- US News–Best Lawyers Recognizes 32 Kaye Scholer Practices and 41 Lawyers November 1, 2016 • Recognitions
- Kaye Scholer Succeeds on Behalf of Term Loan Lenders in Defeating Confirmation... October 31, 2016 • Client Successes
- Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Kaye Scholer Practices and Partners Nationwide October 24, 2016 • Recognitions