Supreme Court Finds that Damages May be Available for a Misleading Retirement Plan Summary Description
Summary: In a potentially far-reaching decision that contained elements of victory for both plan sponsors and plan participants, a unanimous Supreme Court has reversed and remanded a district court decision that a misleading summary plan description (“SPD”) or other communications to participants can be the basis for reforming a retirement plan to mirror the terms of the SPD. CIGNA Corp. v. Arama, No. 09-804, (2011).
The attached Client Alert examines the Court’s decision and the finding that equitable relief, including money damages, may be available under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 for such misleading communications.
Also of Interest
- London Featured in Private Funds Management on Limiting Termination-Based Lawsuits December 7, 2016 • Media Mentions
- Tax Alert: Final Debt Regulations Have Limited Scope of Application November 30, 2016 • Client Alerts
- Chambers UK 2017 Recognizes London Partners and Aviation Finance Practice November 7, 2016 • Recognitions
- US News–Best Lawyers Recognizes 32 Kaye Scholer Practices and 41 Lawyers November 1, 2016 • Recognitions
- ILS and Zinsser Analytic Shareholders Sell to Gardner Denver Medical September 2, 2016 • Client Successes
- Kaye Scholer Advises Veracen on Merger of Equals with Turner Investments August 31, 2016 • Client Successes
- Kaye Scholer Advises Pfizer in Acquisition of Bamboo Therapeutics August 1, 2016 • Client Successes
- Kaye Scholer Represents NexPhase Capital in Acquisition of Zing Zang July 7, 2016 • Client Successes
- Brexit—What We Know June 29, 2016 • Client Alerts