This site makes use of Javascript, please enable your web browser to allow Javascript. Thank you.

CAFA Removal Right Trumps Plaintiff’s “Stipulation”

March 22, 2013

Summary: In a rare display of consensus, a unanimous Supreme Court this week upheld the right of defendants to remain in federal court in a putative class action removed under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) in Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles, No. 11-1450, 2013 WL 1104735 (Mar. 19, 2013); see Kaye Scholer Class Action Deskbook, CAFA Section (3d ed.), at 62 n.57 (noting grant of certiorari). Resolving a Circuit split and reversing a lower court’s decision to remand the action to state court, the Supreme Court held that a “stipulation” provided by the named class plaintiffs unilaterally purporting to limit the class recovery to less than CAFA’s jurisdictional minimum (in excess of $5 million) does not defeat removal under CAFA because the stipulation was not binding on the absent class members.

Also of Interest


Richard A. De Sevo
Of Counsel
icon Email
Paul C. Llewellyn
icon Email
Alan E. Rothman
icon Email
Jeffrey M. Wagner
icon Email

Legal Services


Download: Client Alert (pdf 86180 bytes)